M&E Indicators for International Mediation

Although broad, the trade of mediation is one that can be defined, measured, and evaluated and an astute consumer should be able to shop for a product that is distinguishable from other types of conflict resolution interventions.

 

Defining Mediation

Mediation is a confidential problem-solving process whereby an impartial third-party assists two or more consenting participants to prevent, manage, or resolve a conflict by helping them develop mutually satisfactory solutions to the issues being disputed.

The process used by a mediator can vary according to the role of the mediator, what he or she seeks to achieve, and the complexity of the conflict [1]. The communication strategies that the mediator uses at the table can also vary and range from integrative, transformative, analytical, evaluative, facilitative, to inactive.

Unifying this broad spectrum of interventions are three principles underpinning every mediation process: (1) impartial; (2) voluntary; and (3) confidential, except for imminent threats of violence or impending harm.

Mediation is ultimately about changing the way parties in a conflict behave, but processes that are persuasive, coercive, or manipulative fall outside of the mediator’s ethical boundaries.

 

Mediation Impact Evaluation

Subjective evaluation indicators are those that refer to the participants’ perception that the goals of mediation were achieved or that a desired change has taken place.  Mediation is then qualified as successful when the parties express satisfaction with the process or the outcome of the mediation. Even if a conflict remains unresolved, mediation can change the way the disputants feel about each other and lead to long-term improvement in relationships [2].

Using objective indicators to assess impact, the success of mediation can be measured by a cessation or reduction in the level of violent behavior, by the number of interchanges between the parties, and/or the signing of a binding agreement. Other indicators include the durability of the settlement, the speed with which it was achieved, the cost of achieving it, and the number of issues resolved.

Most importantly, evaluating the success of mediation should be done according to criteria that are significant to its own context.

 

__________

 
[1] For example, the role of a mediator can be formal or informal, he or she can act in an individual capacity or as a state representative, invited or non-invited, permanent or temporary and a mediator’s objective can be to re-build relationships, reach an agreement, and/or diminish incidents of violence
[2] Bercovitch, J. “Introduction: Putting Mediation in Context” in Studies in International Mediation, Palgrave: New York (2002)

Share

The Commodification of Mercenaries

The world has shifted. States that used to symbolize the holders of world order have now become the spoils of war. 

India: violent protests – a social threat

Using dominance has been a common strategy for exerting one's influence throughout human history.

The Pillars of a Regenerative Economy

“How does the world we create become compatible with the world that created us? ” Tamera

GW Video Series: inside out

Frontline mediators are those insiders who have a keen understanding of conflict dynamics, deep relationships with the parties and the awareness of the nuanced language used to express those issue.

  • <
  • 2 of 16
  • >

CONTACT US

Address:    
P.O. Box 79
Stevenson, MD 21153
USA
Email: info@communitiesintransition.com

 

 

 

 

 

Join Us